|
The Cost Argument Defeated |
|
|
|
|
Written by Simon
|
|
Thursday, 21 June 2007 |
The Heritage Foundation reported that the cost of amnesty would be several trillion dollars and the right said “I told you so.” Do this simple test to see how wrong that report is.
Without knowing any other facts which country is healthier; country one
with a population that has an average age of 30 or country two with an
average age of 50? Without immigration the US will be country two
within a few decades. If we don’t allow a robust flow of young
immigrants we will not have enough people to maintain the social
welfare system.
Thanks to Ben Wattenberg and his book "Fewer" for the data for this argument.
Not convinced. Try this test: which neighborhood will flourish in the
future? One with schools or one with senior citizen centers.
Why is the Heritage Foundation report flawed? The report takes a
static look at the data. They don’t see that the low income immigrants
they focus on will move up the income ladder and pay more taxes and
they ignore the benefits of the immigrants children who will move even
farther up the income ladder. And they were looking for facts that supported their bias.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 21 June 2007 )
|