|
Written by Simon
|
|
Tuesday, 28 June 2011 |
|
This is new one on me.
Last week I had to certify under penalty of perjury; that “I am a
U.S. Person.” We were signing some financial documents and on the
page where you give your social security information there was the new phrase
“U.S. Person.”
A United States Person is defined variously by different
government agencies. The gist of it is that if you are a citizen, a legal resident
alien or a corporation formed under US law you are a U.S. Person. Some implications of being a U.S. Person are:
· The
NSA is not supposed to spy on a US Person without a court’s permission.
· The
IRS has permission to tax US Persons.
· You
don’t have to live in the USA to be a United States Person.
· You
don’t have to be a person to be a United States Person. You can be a
corporation or a group.
Since we had to invent United States Person to keep everyone in nice neat categories I
suggest that our rules are too complicated.
U.S. Person appears to be a term invented to fill up the
space between those who are not subject to US law, taxes and constitutional
protections (Foreigners) on the one side and those who clearly are (US Citizens
and resident aliens) on the other extreme. US Person includes trusts, partnerships and corporations that
are formed under US law. It
doesn’t seem to include foreign investors doing business in the US who don’t have
permanent resident visas and it doesn’t include persons living in the US who
don’t have green cards.
As a service I have below the fold included several US
Government agencies definitions of U.S.Person and links.
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 28 June 2011 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Simon
|
|
Wednesday, 15 June 2011 |
|
For people, like me, who want more immigration the last year
in the USA has been a series of setback and disappointments. Arizona passed sb1070 a law making it
harder for people who can’t get visas to live in Arizona. They were followed by Georgia and Arkansas. The Obama administration said they were
going to fight for CIR but only talked.
They didn’t even introduce legislation. The list goes on:
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 15 June 2011 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Simon
|
|
Wednesday, 18 May 2011 |
In The Forward a progressive Jewish Magazine this week there is an article by Gideon Aranoff titled:
What the President Should Do, and How We Can Help
It is worth reading. Aranoff concludes the article with this: "As Americans, we must ensure that we are an inclusive nation, not one
defined by fear and isolation. And as Jews, we must remember that we are
commanded to welcome the strangers — not because they are Jews, but
because we are Jews."
The Catholics have for a long time been actively calling for the right to migrate. Read more here. This article doesn't go that far but it is a start.
|
|
|
Written by Simon
|
|
Thursday, 21 April 2011 |
|
"The right to go where you want should be a principle in a decent world."
Noam Chomsky
|
|
|
Written by Simon
|
|
Wednesday, 13 April 2011 |
"Start by doing what’s necessary, then what’s possible, and
suddenly you are doing the impossible.”
St Francis of Assisi
I applied this wonderful saying from St Francis to the Immigration
debate in the USA and came up with this list:
· What
is necessary is to stop the deportations.
· What
is possible is to pass the Dream Act.
· The
impossible, that we can do, is Comprehensive Immigration Reform that includes a
path to citizenship for those already here and sensible levels of immigration for
responsible people from neighboring countries.
Don't Give Up.
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 13 April 2011 )
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 13 - 18 of 122 |